Thursday, September 10, 2015


Sapiens - a brief history of humanity

 About Homo Sapiens and how Mankind used the Agricultural Revolution, Fantasy, Language, Tales, Religion, Money, Cooking Arts, Hierarchies and Diets to develop.
 
I think the author takes up a lot of very interesting ideas in an inspiring way. But I disagree with him that "free will" does not exist. Our legal history and civilization clearly shows that individuals can use willpower to perform miracles.
 
Especially interesting is that the author points to how important "simple ignorance" has been in creating the modern society.
 It is the Socratic idea that ignorance exists in three different levels:

1) Simple ignorance = to know that you do not know (something to strive for!).

2) Double ignorance = to be unaware that one does not know. (Means that you can reach the level of simple ignorance if someone points out to you that you do not know and you are intelligent enough to then recognize it).

3) Triple ignorance = to be convinced that you know when you do not know. - A hopeless situation, which particularly fundamentalists would find themselves in, if they were smart enough to realize their situation (both religious, political and materialistic).

 It is the hell of fixed ideas, dogmas, preconceived ideas etc.

Interesting discussion with many unusual views – You will find it at:
Historian Yuval Noah Harari takes in the book "Sapiens: a brief history of humanity" us from Homo sapiens first step on the earth, when we were a mammal among all others, until today when we stand as the world's undisputed ruler.

Todde

Also check: 





Monday, August 31, 2015


China Democracy Capitalism Economy TED helps you understand the world today:

The developed world holds up the ideals of capitalism, democracy and political rights for all. Those in emerging markets often don't have that luxury. In this powerful talk, economist Dambisa Moyo makes the case that the west can't afford to rest on its laurels and imagine others will blindly follow. Instead, a different model, embodied by China, is increasingly appealing. A call for open-minded political and economic cooperation in the name of transforming the world. 


 Also watch Dambisa Moyo's lectture (17 minutes long) - you find it at:

https://www.ted.com/playlists/290/talks_for_when_you_realize_you
 (Scroll down to Dambisa Moyos lecture)

Link (Sorry it seems the English subtitles are sometimes removed - If so you can search on Youtube for Chai Jing "Under the Dome" and maybe you can find the film with English subtiteles - It is one hour and 43 minutes long = 103 minutes):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6X2uwlQGQM

 It seems as it works on firefox (English subtitles) better than on Chrome

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6X2uwlQGQM

Also check the effort to build a greater civilisation (use google translate) at:




Todde

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Two of the greatest questions of life

 
An interesting philosophical lecture. Especially the last 11 minutes (from 18 minutes).
 The lecture is in English with Swedish text. Can only be seen in Sweden.


 First I will quote Socrates: A life lived without reflection (= meditation) over life is meaningless (= not worth living). The most important thing in life is not to be influenced by others. The most important thing is to develop oneself (= your true self). Therefore: Make sure that you thirst for wisdom, to improve your judgment. Wisdom is achieved with rigor, power and discipline. Rectitude is achieved through training and discipline to overcome personal shortcomings and weaknesses.

 and another quote in the lecture: Beautiful and very young is Philo-Sofia. - Poetry is her ally in the service of the good.

 I recommend especially the last 11 minutes (from minute 18 on)

Production year: 2014
Duration: 29:10
Available until: July 1, 2020

 Philosopher and writer Rebecca Goldstein has a passionate relationship to the philosophy that allowed her to constantly examine and reassess beliefs. Here she talks about the importance of the renaissance of the thoughts of Enlightenment. She believes there are two kinds of philosophical questions that humans wrestle with: questions about what is and questions about what is significant. For example, we must ask ourselves what kind of universe we exist in, and how we see our own identity and significance.

The program is available at UR Play:

Todde

Also check: http://axiom1b.blogspot.se/2015/03/from-socrates-1-curse-of-person-who.html

Saturday, July 18, 2015

The wisdom of children

 A six year old boy asked his parents:                                                       
 Why does life need bodies?
 The parents were unable to give any sensible answer. Instead, the boy came after a while myself up with an answer:
 It is probably to prevent life from escaping.
 Incredibly beautiful wisdom!

 The importance of Answers

 or:                                                                                   

Socrates Midwife-Method        

 A Nobel Prize winner received a question from a journalist:
 How do you manage to find the answers to Nobel prize winning questions?
 The answer was:
 The art is not to find the right answers. The trick is to ask the right questions.

 From these lines, you can learn how to make it easier for yourselves to become wiser.
 First of all, one can draw the same conclusion as Socrates once did: It is the asking of Socratic questions that makes it possible to recall the wisdom that exists in the spirit of every human being.
 It is important to understand that difficulties to release the inherent wisdom of the mind stem from fixed ideas, prejudices and dogmas. Instead, it is important to open the mind to different ways of thinking, just like many children often do (as opposed to adults).
 You can even find support for these ideas in a famous Jesus quote from the Bible (Matthew 19:14):
 Let the children come to me. The kingdom of God belongs to such as these. Those who are unable to receive the kingdom of God like a child will never enter there.


 Even Socrates felt that it was important to teach the youth rather than older people who already believed they knew. Moreover, Socrates said that the future of the civilization will be created by the young.

 Quote from Theaetetus:

Soc. Such are the mid-wives, whose task is a very important one but not so important as mine; for women do not bring into the world at one time real children, and at another time counterfeits which are with difficulty distinguished from them; if they did, then the, discernment of the true and false birth would be the crowning achievement of the art of midwifery-you would think so? 
Theaet. Indeed I should. 
Soc. Well, my art of midwifery is in most respects like theirs; but differs, in that I attend men and not women; and look after their souls when they are in labour, and not after their bodies: and the triumph of my art is in thoroughly examining whether the thought which the mind of the young man brings forth is a false idol or a noble and true birth. And like the mid-wives, I am barren, and the reproach which is often made against me, that I ask questions of others and have not the wit to answer them myself, is very just-the reason is, that the god compels-me to be a midwife, but does not allow me to bring forth. And therefore I am not myself at all wise, nor have I anything to show which is the invention or birth of my own soul, but those who converse with me profit. Some of them appear dull enough at first, but afterwards, as our acquaintance ripens, if the god is gracious to them, they all make astonishing progress; and this in the opinion of others as well as in their own. It is quite dear that they never learned anything from me; the many fine discoveries to which they cling are of their own making. But to me and the god they owe their delivery. And the proof of my words is, that many of them in their ignorance, either in their self-conceit despising me, or falling under the influence of others, have gone away too soon; and have not only lost the children of whom I had previously delivered them by an ill bringing up, but have stifled whatever else they had in them by evil communications, being fonder of lies and shams than of the truth; and they have at last ended by seeing themselves, as others see them, to be great fools. Aristeides, the son of Lysimachus, is one of them, and there are many others. The truants often return to me, and beg that I would consort with them again-they are ready to go to me on their knees and then, if my familiar allows, which is not always the case, I receive them, and they begin to grow again. Dire are the pangs which my art is able to arouse and to allay in those who consort with me, just like the pangs of women in childbirth; night and day they are full of perplexity and travail which is even worse than that of the women. So much for them. And there are -others, Theaetetus, who come to me apparently having nothing in them; and as I know that they have no need of my art, I coax them into marrying some one, and by the grace of God I can generally tell who is likely to do them good. Many of them I have given away to Prodicus, and many to other inspired sages. I tell you this long story, friend Theaetetus, because I suspect, as indeed you seem to think yourself, that you are in labour-great with some conception. Come then to me, who am a midwife's son and myself a midwife, and do your best to answer the questions which I will ask you. And if I abstract and expose your first-born, because I discover upon inspection that the conception which you have formed is a vain shadow, do not quarrel with me on that account, as the manner of women is when their first children are taken from them. For I have actually known some who were ready to bite me when I deprived them of a darling folly; they did not perceive that I acted from good will, not knowing that no god is the enemy of man-that was not within the range of their ideas; neither am I their enemy in all this, but it would be wrong for me to admit falsehood, or to stifle the truth. Once more, then, Theaetetus, I repeat my old question, "What is knowledge?"-and do not say that you cannot tell; but quit yourself like a man, and by the help of God you will be able to tell.

 If you want to read the full dialogue "Theaetetus" you will find it on:

http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/theatu.html

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Recycling Economy – benefits both work and environment

 The by far best way to adjust our civilisation to the challenges of the future is by adjusting our societies to systems of recycling. Alas that is not what is currently being done. Both technological developments and climate issues involve growing challenges. A Switch to circular economy, where recycling and green energy dominates, is necessary.

 The discussion about our future jobs needs to be broadened. The debate today is as if we still live in an industrial society and that jobs will automatically increase with growth in GDP. But such guarantees do not exist anymore. The digitalization of the economy cancels many conventional rules of economy. Investments in robots and automation is increasing rapidly. People are replaced by machines. Of course new jobs are created, but not at the pace we have been used to.

 As the rapid evolution of technology continues - with many fascinating opportunities - the tension between economy and environment increases. It is no exaggeration to say that conventional economic growth is on a collision course with nature. An increasingly unstable climate and overexploited ecosystems and natural resources are the most obvious examples.

 Environmental measures have so far often been regarded as threats to both competitiveness and jobs. At the same time it is obvious that waste of energy and material can not continue as before. The prices for various commodities have increased rapidly. Material costs (including cost of energy) amount in some industries to 40-50% of total costs. Moreover, the costs to society of rapidly increasing climate and environmental impact is steadily growing. Some resources are moving towards clear problems of scarcity (i. e. peak phosphor and peak oil).

 With a growing world population (the basic problem behind most of our challenges) coupled with a necessary increase in living standards in low-income countries, the pressure on nature will continue to increase. A more efficient use of resources would save both money and our nature. In addition jobs would increase, as we are about to show. The conclusion is that the agenda for jobs and environment must meet. Sweden has many reasons to take the lead.

 Today's economy is essentially based on the principle of "buy and throw away". The logic of the last fifty years has been the faster we replace our gadgets, the better for enterprises and the economy. This is not good enough.

 The vast majority of our products are discarded today. This waste represents great values ​​that could be used again - and again. Today it is not OK to allow that valuable, ever more scarce materials fall into incinerators, often without sorting first, and risking serious pollution of both air and water.

 Sustainable development demands that we invest in an economy where energy consumption is based increasingly on renewable energy with maximal efficiency. Products should be designed both to last longer and facilitate recycling, dismantling, recycling and remanufacturing. One example is electronics designed for longer life and to be easily disassembled, so that components can be reused. Another example is furniture from recycled plastic, which in turn can be recycled.

 Changes in design must be accompanied with new business models . Selling services is a winning formula. Michelin rent tires for heavy vehicles and charge per km. The tires are recycled and retreaded. Renault takes back old engines, renovate them and then use them in new vehicles. At Mud Jeans and Houdini you can rent clothes instead of buying. Digital Lumens provides smart lighting as a service as an alternative to purchase.

 Not only scientists, but also companies and unions, who want to protect their business and jobs, now directs interest towards radical increases in efficiency of resource use during all stages of a product's life cycle.

 Development towards a more circular economy will not happen by itself. Policy must be made to help with both smart instruments and public investments to enable the transition. The share of environmental taxes in total tax collection in Sweden is currently just under 6 percent and the amount in billions of crowns is decreasing. Labour taxes make up 60 percent, so there are great opportunities to switch taxes to make it easier to hire people and reverse unsustainable patterns. Good work increases professionalism and the meaning of life and strengthens society instead of making unsustainable environmental impacts. Abusing our natural resources will destroy possibilities for future generations to live good lives.

 To create a society with low environmental and climate impact can be done by building railways and public transport solutions for the smart grid - investments that the public sector must initiate. With the right kind of investment – around 100 billion a year, roughly equivalent to 2-3 percent of GDP annually – we would after fifteen years to be on the way to a more circular economy.

 The Club of Rome has recently carried out a simulation of the Swedish economy. How would Sweden look today if we were already more energy efficient, had a higher percentage of renewable energy as well as a far more efficient use of materials? Each of these actions would, in the model run, lead to a significant reduction in carbon dioxide emissions. The total would be close to 70 percent. In addition, the analysis showed that more than 100,000 new jobs would be created. As a matter of fact there would be more jobs with an economy in harmony with narture and caring for what has already been produced than in a "buy and dispose economy”.

 If we want to move towards a more circular economy, political action is absolutely essential - both at EU and national level:

1. Develop renewable energy. Strengthen the Ecodesign Directive - to include both energy and material efficiency - and reform the ETS so that the primary objective: "to move away from coal".is achieved, 

2. Sharpen requirements for recovery and recycling of materials and prevent waste. Increase taxes on waste incineration.

3. Use public procurement to attract new business models with focus shifted from selling products to selling support and services.

4. Tax Shift: lower taxes on labour and increase taxes on environmental impact and on exploiting nature

5. Cancel VAT on recycled materials.

 We live in a world where threats of drastic climate change are increasing. At the same time, unemployment is rising, especially among young people. The digitalization of the economy presents both opportunities and problems. The technology helps us to use resources more efficiently. At the same time there is a risk that many people will be out of jobs, when lots of tasks are taken over by machines. We should not argument against increased investment in sustainable energy, transport and material systems and a shift of the tax burden from labour to natural resources. Such actions would stimulate developments towards exploiting nature in a more responsible manner.

 Johan Rockström, professor of environmental sciences, director of the Stockholm Resilience Centre

 Per Olof Sjöö, Chairman of the GS union

 Per Stoltz, sustainability developerWorks, Ikea Group


 Anders Wijkman, chairman of the Club of Rome

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Socrates’ Gossip Filter

Gossip - Slander – Fairy tales


 Everyone has sometimes listened to gossip and slander. If you tend to be less critical and hateful maybe you can boast with having heard more gossip than you have spread. Alas most of us have still contributed to gossip and slander far too often by spreading some of what we heard to others. In a spirit of "making-a-hen-of-a-feather" we have probably at one time or another even “improved” such tales. When the world we lived in was smaller, it was "gossip mongers", who were spreading gossip. But if nobody had been listening to the gossip, the gossip would quickly have died out. There is a proverb that says: "It is rarely the fault of only, one when two are quarrelling." According to some philosophers, there is often a third party involved when two who quarrel cannot stop and the conflict seems "insoluble".
 Rule: If two people have a conflict that they can not resolve with the help of live communication, it is because there is someone or something that keeps on creating the conflict. In order to solve such a conflict the “third party” needs to be located and handled.
 The insoluble conflict between Jews and Palestinians is a clear example of a third party conflict. Without the constant flow of false information from religious fundamentalists the two sides could probably resolve the conflict. At least if both sides would adopt some more conciliatory and humble attitudes.

Data Vacuum

 When you do not know anything about some other individual or group a "data vacuum" is easily created. A data vacuum arises from the desire to know when you do not know. Then you get a tendency to fill this vacuum with whatever fits in. Without data vacuums gossip and/or slander would not work. You, as a fellow human being, should therefore be obliged to get yourself vaccinated against gossip and slander by reducing your uncontrolled desire to know. It is much better to know that you do not know than to believe that you know. Anyone who satisfies his/her desire to know by filling their data vacuums with all kinds of gossip and slander is so far from Socratic ideals as is possible.
 In courts, it is considered a serious offense to speak untruths about others that may get those others convicted for something they are not guilty of. It is called committing perjury and is punishable in court.
 In daily life, nobody is sentencing individuals who slander or gossips, even if others are experiencing all sorts of bad things and difficulties because of it. You should cure your data vacuums by being content with realizing that you “do not know” and instead devote yourself to philosophical fairy tales and live communication.

Gossip in the Modern World

 In modern societies gossip mongers and their ilk is certainly still active in the small context. But now we have large sophisticated organizations, which can gossip much more and more effectively. We have media that have been spreading so much slander and gossip that most of us have long ago been forced to realize that "it need not be true just because it says so in newspapers or on radio or if shown on television."
 Moreover, we have the Internet, where everyone is free to publish almost anything. As long as we have data vacuums that needs filling, many lies fall conveniently in place in the data vacuums of our minds. So please realize that we have some responsibility for what happens in our surroundings. We have an obligation to try to avoid receiving and spreading slander and gossip. We actually have an obligation to recognize that we do not know only because we have filled our data vacuums with information. We have an obligation to recognize that information can be both false and true. It is our duty not to disseminate false information, if we want our communities to function. To be aware that you do not know is a Socratic ideal. To accept responsibility for the data vacuums in your mind that are filled with information that you never checked properly, when you accepted it, is an obligation that is not easily fulfilled. Almost everyone who has anything good to say to his surroundings will sooner or later be defamed by questionable "educators", who feel threatened by what is said.
 The gossiping and slandering artists have a method to gain acceptance for their views. They turn to the ignorant masses peddling "labels" that they make people accept. E.g. they say that "sects" are always evil. They do not inform their followers that sects can be both good and bad. When the ignorant masses have learned that "all sects are evil," it is enough to put the label "sect" to a group for it to be classified as a vicious group, regardless of the goodness or badness of that group.

Fairy Tales

 Gossip and slander consists of truths, falsehoods and outright lies. If you believe in gossip and slander you will easily get a negative view of your fellow human beings. Fairy tales are the opposite of gossip and slander. Fairy tales also consist of truths, falsehoods and/or lies. Anyone who reads a fairy tale does not believe that the fairy tale is true just because it is written. One reads fairy tale to receive the message that the tale conveys. Spiritually edifying fairy tales convey spiritually edifying messages. Virtually all written materials in the philosophy of life claims to be spiritually edifying fairy tales. We do not claim that such stories are true (even if the message may be a message of truth). We only ask the person studying the written materials to try to understand the message and use it to increase their spiritual wealth. The same principle applies to Socratic questions. The question itself means nothing. It is only when the individual answers the question and gives birth to their own ideas and truths, that the question fulfils its purpose.
 Fairy tales are the positive side of the coin, if gossip and slander is the negative. Information can be used positively or negatively for good or evil. It's the result that counts.
 Some of the most uplifting tales we know in our modern Western civilization, are the stories of Gautama (Buddha), Socrates and Jesus. As life-philosophers we do not worry about the truth of our fairy tales. All we need to know is that individuals studying them are elevated to new levels of awareness by their messages.

The gossip filter of Socrates

 When Socrates met a friend who wanted to tattle to him, he asked his friend to first undergo a threefold test. He proposed three "filter questions":
 1) Are you absolutely sure that what you are about to say is true?
 2) Is what you want to tell me something inherently good or desirable?
 3) Can what you want to tell me be of good use?
 If what the friend wanted to tell Socrates met one or more of these three criteria, it was good to inform Socrates of it, otherwise it was just as well to leave it unsaid.
 Each one of us can by answering these three filter questions sort out gossip and slander from our speech.
 Imagine if the tabloids used these three questions before they announced their "news" to us.
 Moral; Believe in gossip and slander and you feel worse. Make sure you receive spiritually uplifting messages and your life will improve.
The choice is yours!


Todde

Thursday, May 21, 2015

A disturbing thought about low interest rates

Thoughts in Sweden on lower interest rates


 Lower interest rate – press the accelerator. Now! The pressures central banks are under to fix the economy have rarely been greater. But what if low interest rates are not the magic solution, but part of the problem
 Anyone who follows the merciless criticism of the Governor (Governor Stefan Ingves), led by the likes of former colleague Lars EO Svensson, may begin to wonder. Perhaps the explanation is that Stefan Ingves plays the lead role in a monetary equivalent of Fifty Shades of Grey, a sadist who finds enjoyment in high unemployment and the sight of closed factories in a darkening Swedish countryside.
 There was a time when Sweden’s central bank monetary policy protocols could be prescribed as an anaesthetic. Today the bank is a besieged institution where every breath is strictly monitored. The cause of the anger toward Stefan Ingves is that he is blamed for sabotaging the Swedish economy with (what the critics consider insanely high) the key interest rate at 1 percent. This policy has created a slightly bad mood when things now are going shaky. The hard truth is that growth in much of the industrialized world is still far below what we have been used to.
 Lars E O Svensson and others were supported when the former US Treasury Larry Summers recently held a widely publicized speech. In brief, Larry Summers theory is that something is essentially sick with the world economy. The sickness started long before the financial crisis and the world economy has been in a semi depressive condition and need large doses of uppers just to function somewhat normally.
 In such situations old dreary measures, like managing state finances and ensuring that banks do not engage in irresponsible lending, become obsolete. In fact counterproductive, says Larry Summers and even Paul Krugman, who runs the thesis. That is the reason for central banks to continue “stimulating the economy” by printing ever more money (i.e. QE = Quantative Easening).
 These men may well be right. (If so we have a problem, more on that shortly).
 But there is also another possibility. It's just the opposite. The anorexic economy is not due to high interest rates, but at too low for too long. So says Bill White, who for 40 years held a number of top jobs in central banks around the world, and already in 2003 warned of a coming crisis.
 He notes that central banks, especially the Federal Reserve, since the 1987 stock market crash cut interest rates at the slightest sign of economic downturn. But cuts in bad times have not been followed by corresponding increases in interest rates in good times.
 Bubbles have barely cracked until they have been replaced by new ones. And for every slump, central banks have been forced to cut rates even more to achieve the same stimulating effect. Why? According to Bill White, an explanation may be that whole economies weakened as depressed interest rates for a long time lead to wrong investments that never get corrected: debts are not written down and zombie companies are kept alive at the expense of more viable projects. Read Japan since 1990 and in Europe today.
 Unfortunately former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and others considered that it was not their job to prevent bubbles, but only to clean up afterwards. Interest rate increases were not needed: There was no inflation! However, this was an optical illusion, according to Bill White.
 The low inflation was not due to central banks' ability or the absence of overheating but on globalization and a tsunami of cheap goods from Asia. THIS productivity shock according to Bill White should have been met with increased interest rates instead of lowering. The result: a dramatic increase in debt and the mother of all bubbles bursting in 2007. And this crash has been handled with even more extreme lows. This has given very meager dividends, except that inflated stock markets made the rich even richer. According to Bill White the old problems remained unresolved and some new were added. The medicine that should have cured the symptoms became one of the causes of the disease.
 Which brings us to the sad part of all this. Bill White may indeed very well be wrong. But if he is right the dependency on low interest rates must be broken sooner or later, otherwise we are threatened by a long period of depression and unemployment, not to mention the risk of another crash. Moreover, it is high time for reforms and other unpopular measures that are otherwise easily pushed into the future as long as there's an easier way. Nothing indicates that this is going to happen.
 If Krugman & Co. are right, we are however not much better off. Should interest rates really lie well below the minus mark (technically impossible?) and the world's major countries turn around and ignore the rampant indebtedness (politically unlikely)? Whichever analysis is correct, it looks then like a historical mistake is about to be committed.
 It would be nice if these economists could get into more agreement with each other and then brief an occasional politician on a better solution. Those who will eventually have to pay the price, our young ones who spend their time in the world kindergartens and primary schools, do not at all care about who is right, if he is called Krugman, Svensson, Mr Ingves or White. They will be busy with other things.
 One of the laws of life that seem to be most forgotten is that when changes (like financial policies of interest rates) are introduced into societies, the population adjusts accordingly.


Todde